EQ: Should performance enhancing drugs (such as steroids) be accepted in sports?
Background: A sport argument because of PEDs which cause health effects. Steroids caused the athletic to have higher improvement, then if they were not using steroids. The PEDs is overzealous, unproductive, and very unfairly administered. A player who is using drugs is sending a depraved message to children. Athletics are buying the drugs from a person name Victor Conte.The athletics are using the drugs while in the locker room stalls.
Claim: Performance enhancing drugs should not be accepted in sports because they lead to health issue, make sport worse, and are a bad influence on children. The health issues cause you to get very emotional influence. The sport will become worse, because the team is falling apart cause of the use of drugs. Children will have a negative impact because they look up to that athletic.
Support: “Performance enhancers, like steroids and other forms of doping, have a negative effect on long-term health. For then users of these enhancers are hurting themselves in the long run without on the average improving their short-term rewards from athletic competition, as long as competitors also use harmful enhancers. This is the main rationale for trying to ban steroids and other forms of doping from athletic competitions.” (Gary Becker, PhD) Steroids are very strong drugs to be using during sports. Drugs in general cause a lot of pain to athletic sportsmen, because the body is just reflecting on drugs instead the liquids needed. During drugs in sports can cause violence and attitude toward people. The fans are getting a negative impact; because they see an athletic person using drugs they think it okay.